Wednesday, 26 May 2010
Sunday, 21 February 2010
Friday, 12 February 2010
Indycar Just went Unique...
That is, Until now.
You see, the IRL has been holding a competition between three design teams - Dallara, Swift, and DeltaWing Racing.
Up first in this Petrol-powered Triplethreat: Dallara
Now, Dallara have entered three designs, two of them look very Traditional Indycar:


However, their most intriguing one is this one - a much more futuristic design with what looks like a heavy wing at the back:

The front wing also looks very solid and chunky on this design, presumably to deal with paint-trading fun. The rear wheels also look to be mostly enclosed just in front of the rear wing, making the car less likely to go airborne in a wheel-to-wheel clash. a good design, and I've got a feeling this is one of the ones the IRL will look at the most.
Next up, we have Swift's design...

...Which is apparently funded by Wayne Enterprises. Its a good looker, but I'm not sure how much of it would translate to an actual car, especially that front wing. I just don't see how much aero-grip thats going to offer this car. In this design, the rear wheel is also more open, giving more risk of the cars going skywards, and as discussed in a previous entry, racecars are not meant to fly.
Finally, though, we have the most interesting, and certainly the most controversial design being pitched - and ironically, its also the one that is closest to being a working goddamn car: the DeltaWing.
That car looks epic. It's designed to be hugely low on drag, and has completely enclosed wheels to prevent any flying issues. Its also, apparently, the one most of the drivers on the grid like best.
Personally, I hink theres one, blinding obvious way to decided between the three - Race the fuckers! Three designs fighting it out for the right to be made the reigning indycar!
Do it, IRL. You know you want to.
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
The Elephant in the Room...
One of the things that has always truly, truly irritated me is the immediate response of the the media to blame violence on video games.
Let me paint a picture for you: I am 24. I have been playing violent games since the age of ten. I have shot Nazis, zombies, girls boys, and occasionally, the odd shark. Sometimes I run them over in a car.
I have never once thought it would be okay for me to go and shoot someone in real life, and violence on the news has always made me feel bad.
Yet tonight, my wife is watching an episode of “Jo Frost's Extreme Parental Guidance” that says that playing a violent video game for 20 goddamn minutes desensitises kids to violent footage from the news.
Their evidence for this? That the kids heart-rates stayed the same, rather than rising in response to it. I call bullshit.
What they have proven there is that kids don't react in a physical manner. Because they have been Prepared for the worst.
However, research has shown that kids who play video games have improved reactions and observational skills. Bet that wont be mentioned, hmm?
Of course, the amount and content of games played by kids is... of course... DOWN TO THE FUCKING PARENTS.
Jesus Christ. Take some fucking responsibility.
This rant brought to you by Videogamers for parents paying attention to their goddamn kids.
Of course, there would be an advantage to stopping playing videogames. It would stop them ruining my left 4 dead 2 sessions.
Friday, 22 January 2010
The Tank KO'd my update...
...And will continue to do so. See ya!
-Bendana
Friday, 1 January 2010
Why i hate the Internet.
I then made the mistake of looking at the BBC Have your Say boards. much less awesome.
Some samples. All names have been removed to disguise the idiocy:
---
The script writers need to be told that their stories will be rejected if Deux ex Machina is used to solve plots.
And please - no more running around screaming for supposed suspense or drawn out scenes attempting to give it gravitas. It is all so light-weight and badly written.
A true reflection of British society; dumbed down, celebrity driven and all gloss no substance.
---
Because Doctor Who is meant to relfect the current nature of the British people. Next series - the Doctor gets into trouble after claiming expenses in the gallifreyan parliament for a doghouse for K-9!
---
i really can't believe the writers of doctor who completely cut out the one and only sexy david tenant like who does that? i mean really people what the hell are you thinking man? love you David....gone but never forgotten.....you will always have a special place in my heart even though you won't be on my tv screen anymore
---
Y'know, David Tennant hasn't actually fucking DIED. but according to you, he should play the Doctor, and only the doctor. For ever and ever amen.
---
Dr Who is supposed to be contentious,challenging, frightening, boundary breaking, but above all else SCARY and FUN.
Instead we got yet another bog standard appaulingly produced BBC Sci Fi drama like Survivors, Day Of The Triffids etc that was multi cultural, politically correct, inclusive, diverse and basically not up to the job. David Tennant is a truly great actor who was ruined with really poor script writing.
It was East Enders on a bad day.
---
This one REALLY pissed me off. Because according to this guy, Doctor Who should only feature White people. Talking to White people.
Doctor Who - Bought to you by the BNP.
---
In the old days, Dr Who changed appearance with a few lights and out of focus shoyts.... now we have explosions and fires and breaking glass.... why? Don't the people who make these programmes understand that we've already seen it. Again. And agian. And again...
---
It's called Drama:
Drama - Noun - any situation or series of events having vivid, emotional, conflicting, or striking interest or results: the drama of a murder trial.
---
And thats quite enough stupidity for one day.